<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Supply-Chain-Security on Start AI Tools - Presented by Intent Solutions</title><link>https://startaitools.com/tags/supply-chain-security/</link><description>Recent content in Supply-Chain-Security on Start AI Tools - Presented by Intent Solutions</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Intent Solutions. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 13:03:18 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://startaitools.com/tags/supply-chain-security/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The 35x FLOPs Error That Peer Review Predicted</title><link>https://startaitools.com/posts/flops-correction-unchecked-derivation-peer-review/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://startaitools.com/posts/flops-correction-unchecked-derivation-peer-review/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Peer review is not paperwork. When a reviewer tells you &amp;ldquo;unchecked derivations are your highest-risk failure class,&amp;rdquo; they are handing you the exact failure that will bite you if you skip the checklist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On April 15 a FLOPs figure in pre-filing patent artifacts for QCSS quietly moved from 19M to 679M — a 35x underestimate — exactly the class the reviewers flagged. Elsewhere in the portfolio that same day, cosign and SLSA provenance shipped for a daemon image, an 11-dimension code-cleanup plugin landed, a 5-agent research chain got recoverable failure states, and a marketplace shed 24,884 lines of obsolete scripts. Different projects, same pattern: systematize against the failure classes you can name.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>