<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pitch-Deck on Start AI Tools - Presented by Intent Solutions</title><link>https://startaitools.com/tags/pitch-deck/</link><description>Recent content in Pitch-Deck on Start AI Tools - Presented by Intent Solutions</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Intent Solutions. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 23:29:08 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://startaitools.com/tags/pitch-deck/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>IRSB Agent Guardrails Pivot, Products Workspace Launch, and the Pitch Deck Sprint</title><link>https://startaitools.com/posts/irsb-agent-guardrails-pivot-products-workspace-launch/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 10:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://startaitools.com/posts/irsb-agent-guardrails-pivot-products-workspace-launch/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thirteen commits across three repos. The biggest shift wasn&amp;rsquo;t code — it was strategic positioning. IRSB went from &amp;ldquo;intent receipts and solver bonds&amp;rdquo; to &amp;ldquo;on-chain guardrails for AI agents&amp;rdquo; in a single day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-guardrails-pivot"&gt;The Guardrails Pivot&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IRSB had been positioned as a general-purpose intent settlement protocol. The contracts worked. The tests passed. But the pitch was abstract — &amp;ldquo;receipts for solver execution&amp;rdquo; doesn&amp;rsquo;t make anyone&amp;rsquo;s eyes light up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The pivot reframed everything around a concrete problem: AI agents with wallet access and no spending controls. Every major agent framework (AgentKit, ElizaOS, Olas, Virtuals) gives agents the ability to sign transactions. None of them answer the question: what happens when the agent overspends?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>