<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Idempotency on Start AI Tools - Presented by Intent Solutions</title><link>https://startaitools.com/tags/idempotency/</link><description>Recent content in Idempotency on Start AI Tools - Presented by Intent Solutions</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Intent Solutions. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 04:21:41 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://startaitools.com/tags/idempotency/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Making a Fire-and-Forget Writer Safe Under Failure</title><link>https://startaitools.com/posts/making-fire-and-forget-capture-safe-under-failure/</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://startaitools.com/posts/making-fire-and-forget-capture-safe-under-failure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a hook that distills a finished Claude Code session into a few durable learnings and proposes them to a shared team brain. It runs on &lt;code&gt;SessionEnd&lt;/code&gt;. Nobody watches it. That last sentence is the entire problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The manual counterpart — a &lt;code&gt;/brain-save&lt;/code&gt; command a teammate types when they want to keep something — has been safe for months. Not because the write path was safe, but because a human was standing over it. A human notices when a capture fails. A human doesn&amp;rsquo;t hit save twice in a panic. A human sees the error toast and shrugs. The forgiving hands were attached to a person, and the person was the safety system.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>