<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evaluation on Start AI Tools - Presented by Intent Solutions</title><link>https://startaitools.com/tags/evaluation/</link><description>Recent content in Evaluation on Start AI Tools - Presented by Intent Solutions</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Intent Solutions. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 23:29:08 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://startaitools.com/tags/evaluation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>j-rig Binary Eval Framework: Ten Epics, One Day</title><link>https://startaitools.com/posts/j-rig-binary-eval-framework-ten-epics-one-day/</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://startaitools.com/posts/j-rig-binary-eval-framework-ten-epics-one-day/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Twenty-eight commits. Ten epics. A TypeScript monorepo that went from &lt;code&gt;pnpm init&lt;/code&gt; to drift detection, eval packs, and a calibration engine in one calendar day. j-rig is a binary evaluation framework: given a skill definition and an execution trace, did the agent demonstrate the skill or not? Yes/no. Binary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;ldquo;binary&amp;rdquo; part is the whole point. Eval frameworks love to produce scores — 0.73 out of 1.0, 4 out of 5 stars, &amp;ldquo;mostly correct.&amp;rdquo; These numbers feel precise but they&amp;rsquo;re not actionable. When your agent scores 0.73 on &amp;ldquo;can it parse a config file,&amp;rdquo; what do you do? Is that good? Is that a regression? Binary evaluation strips away the false precision. The agent either parsed the config file or it didn&amp;rsquo;t. Pass or fail. Now you can count, trend, and alert on real signals.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>